Thursday, 7 November 2013

What is Illustration?

How do we define illustration?
Illustration is an image which is made for a purpose, used to communicate to people without necessarily using text.



What makes good illustration?

To be good Illustration an image must adhere to three criteria; there must be an image, an idea, and it must have context. If any of these are missing, it is not an illustration.



What can illustration do?
Illustration can communicate information through a visual means, as well as looking aesthetically pleasing. It can have an emotional importance or reflect someones personal attitudes.


Semiotic Analysis



(Dracula, art by Bill Wiggins)

This illustration by Bill Wiggins is for the Hammer Horror film Dracula (1958) closely based on the book of the same name by Bram Stoker. This poster immediately denotes that this is indeed a horror film.

There is a simple narrative on display in this piece; to the right of the poster we can see a man leaning over a female. Her features connote to the audience that she is relaxed, possibly even asleep whilst he leans over her with an unsavoury look upon his face and sharp teeth protruding from his mouth. This signifies that he is most likely the villain of the piece, Dracula. The female meanwhile is showing a bit of flesh suggesting a sense of vulnerability, which was quite stereotypical, especially in films of this nature at the point in time when this film was made. Her white clothing implies a virginal innocence, a goodness strongly contrasted by Dracula’s black garments suggesting power, mystery and an overall negative vibe. Their well-tailored clothes signify that this film involves people of a certain class, which is further conveyed by the female’s well-kept appearance and groomed hair. Meanwhile the villain himself has greased back hair, which despite signifying a potentially different cultural background still suggests some sort of social standing.

Meanwhile the black thematic continues with the background, not only serving to connote the dark nature of the film but allowing for the illusion of Dracula appearing out of the darkness also.

A bold red typeface is at the forefront of the image with the title of the film, Dracula, which starkly contrasts the surrounding darkness of the poster. This helps grab the audience attention and signifies that the male in the poster is indeed Dracula, the villain of the piece. Note that the typeface is red, which is the same colour of blood, a strong theme within the narrative of the film. It is also written in large capital letters, transforming the title somewhat and suggesting that it shouldn’t just be read, but shouted aloud.

Around the poster there is additional yellow text, which is written in an informative manner. It tells the audience that the story is about ‘The TERRIFYING Lover – who died – yet lived!’ The word terrifying is in a capitalized harsh typeface to add a sense of dread to the word, whilst the word lover has a capital ‘L’ to give the word more power. With an advisory message at the bottom of the piece that states ‘Don’t dare see it alone!’ it is clear that a target audience for this film is couples. This would also explain why there is also a connotative romanticism in the posture of Dracula and the female.

Finally the acting credits above and below the title are in a dull green typeface to separate them from the black background whilst also making them less apparent than the title of the film or the informative surrounding text. This sans serif typeface is somewhat serious compared to the aforementioned text; this signifies a sense of professionalism on the actor’s part. After all, despites its outlandish premise the film is well crafted and brilliantly acted, changing the typeface, perhaps making it friendlier or softer, would detract from the skilled attitude of the actors themselves.

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Image Analysis Exercise


(‘Daddy, what did YOU do in the Great War?’ (1915) by Savile Lumley)

(‘The Uncle Sam Range’ (1876) by Shumacher & Ettlinger)

In several respects ‘The Uncle Sam Range’ (1876) by Shumacher & Ettlinger, and ‘Daddy, what did YOU do in the Great War?’ (1915) by Savile Lumley are similar pieces of work. One such thing being that both illustrations are playing on its audiences sense of pride. ‘The Uncle Sam Range’ is trying to sell a ‘range’ cooking appliance whilst ‘...the Great War...’ piece is trying to get men to join the war campaign. 

To sell the ‘range’ Shumacher and Ettlinger play on a man’s need to have the best there is, and who would use the best American made ‘range’? Uncle Sam. In the centre of the heavily decorated room of Stars and Stripes they have one of the great American symbols in all his red, white and blue glory. Here he entertains the world, with its list of dishes, whilst a lady behind him serves food and a servant boy prepares a roast bird. The image suggests an American man couldn’t possibly do any better than this appliance, especially at a time when pride in America couldn't be greater. The clock that sits behind on the mantlepiece reads 1776 - 1876 suggesting it is the hundredth anniversary of America’s victory for independence. At the front and centre of the image its product name is displayed as a bold Saloon like typeface - everything about this illustration screams ‘Buy this American product and be proud’.

Meanwhile Lumley’s ‘...the Great War...’ piece relies on people not wanting to be ashamed of themselves rather than their their purchases. This piece was made during the middle of the war before conscription took place – in an attempt to convince people to join the war effort before there was a forced initiative. Lumley situates a father, at some point after the war, sitting in a comfortable looking armchair covered in the fleur de lis; his daughter sits on his lap reading whilst his son plays with toy soldiers. He looks to the audience as his daughter asks ‘Daddy, what did YOU do in the Great War?’ It asks the audience what his kids would think of him should he told them he had never joined the war effort. There is text situated at the bottom of the page, allowing the viewer to see the image first. This eloquent looking typeface suggests a certain level of class, and judging by the look of the families clothes and the appearance of the room they are in, this man has done well for himself. But did he have the courage to stand in front of a cannon just as his son’s toy soldier is? It is trying to question people’s pride by telling them if they don’t join the war effort they will shame their families.

Both of these pieces play on people’s opinions of themselves and that is where they both succeed. If people failed to care about what others thought these illustrations would have to be designed very differently to target a separate aspect of its intended audience.

Saturday, 12 October 2013

Fine Art and Illustration



Quentin Blake is well known as an illustrator, but he also does intense studies of people within what could be considered the realm of ‘fine art’. These pieces are more abstract and despite being an examination of the human form serve little illustrative purpose. Perhaps if these pieces were collected together into a sequence of images or told a story they could be considered illustration. However as it stands, with just the image seen below, the work is more akin to fine art than illustration due to its singularity.

Saturday, 5 October 2013

Love and Hate

Below of five examples of things that I either love or hate (although I do consider these words quite strong and would rather describe the examples as like or dislike).

Birmingham Library
Birmingham Library is an eyesore. It is soon to be replaced by a bigger eyesore.


Quentin Blake
A man who makes dark, beautiful imagery with haphazard line work.

Christopher Nolan
Christopher Nolan Films are ace! The man is a rare director in a pit of sh*t.


David Cameron
David Cameron is an ass. He tries to be cool with comments such as 'hug a hoodie' and fails miserably.

http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/jan/17/radiohead-thom-yorke-david-cameron


Kate Leth
Kate Leth is an illustrator and comic book writer with strong feminine ideals.